4.7 Article

Platelet Transfusion Practices Among Neonatologists in the United States and Canada: Results of a Survey

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 278-285

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-2850

关键词

platelet transfusions; neonates; transfusion-transmitted CMV; thrombocytopenia

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-69990]
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL069990] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. In the absence of scientific evidence, current neonatal platelet transfusion practices are based on physicians' preferences, expert advice, or consensus-driven recommendations. We hypothesized that there would be significant diversity in platelet transfusion triggers, product selection, and dosing among neonatologists in the United States and Canada. METHODS. A Web-based survey on neonatal platelet transfusion practices was distributed to all members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Perinatal Section in the United States and to all physicians listed in the 2005 Canadian Neonatology Directory. RESULTS. The overall response rate was 37% (1060 of 2875). In the United States, 37% (1007 of 2700) responded, of which 52% practiced at academic centers. Thirty percent (53 of 175) of Canadians responded, of whom 94% practiced at academic centers. As hypothesized, there was significant practice diversity in both countries. The survey also revealed that platelet transfusions are frequently administered to nonbleeding neonates with platelet counts of > 50 x 10(9)/L. This practice is particularly prevalent among neonates with specific clinical conditions, including indomethacin treatment, preceding procedures, in the postoperative period, or with intraventricular hemorrhages. CONCLUSIONS. There is great variability in platelet transfusion practices among US and Canadian neonatologists, suggesting clinical equipoise in many clinical scenarios. Prospective randomized clinical trials to generate evidence-based neonatal platelet transfusion guidelines are needed. Pediatrics 2009;123:278-285

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据