4.6 Article

1H nuclear magnetic resonance brain metabolomics in neonatal mice after hypoxia-ischemia distinguished normothermic recovery from mild hypothermia recoveries

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 74, 期 2, 页码 170-179

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2013.88

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health: from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01-GM36747, P41-GM68933]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01-NS33997]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Mild brain hypothermia (31-34 degrees C) after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) improves neurodevelopmental outcomes in human and animal neonates. Using an asphyxia model with neonatal mice treated with mild hypothermia after HI, we investigated whether H-1 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics of brain extracts could suggest biomarkers and distinguish different treatments and outcome groups. METHODS: At postnatal day 7 (P7), CD1 mice underwent right carotid artery occlusion, 30 min of HI (8% oxygen), and 3.5 h of either hypothermia (31 degrees C) or normothermia (37 degrees C). Whole brains were frozen immediately after HI, immediately after 3.5 h of hypothermia or normothermia treatments, and 24h later. Perchloric acid extractions of 36 metabolites were quantified by 900 MHz H-1 NMR spectroscopy. Multivariate analyses included principal component analyses (PCA) and a novel regression algorithm. Histological injury was quantified after HI at 5 d. RESULTS: PCA scores plots separated normothermia/HI animals from hypothermia/HI and control animals, but more data are required for multivariate models to be predictive. Loadings plots identified 11 significant metabolites, whereas the regression algorithm identified 6. Histological injury scores were significantly reduced by hypothermia. CONCLUSION: Different treatment and outcome groups are identifiable by H-1 NMR metabolomics in a neonatal mouse model of mild hypothermia treatment of HI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据