4.5 Article

Mineral nutrition and specific leaf area of plants under contrasting long-term fire frequencies: a case study in a mesic savanna in Australia

期刊

TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 329-335

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-015-1285-1

关键词

Fire management; Leaf scleromorphism; Native plant nutrition; Soil fertility

类别

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (Capes)
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2010/07809-1, 2012/13762-3]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [308902/2014-9, 306119/2011-0, 306243/2010-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fire frequency is considered to be a controlling factor for the structure of savanna vegetation, also affecting functional aspects of plants, yet studies contrasting long-term burnt and unburnt sites within the same area are rare. At fire-protected sites, one may expect to find woody vegetation with non-sclerophyllous leaves exhibiting a high nutrient concentration and growing on soils of high fertility. Using a burnt (14 times within the last 20 years) and an unburnt site (over the same period) within the same area of a mesic Australian savanna, we compared the soil fertility, specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf macronutrient concentration of the exclusive (species that occur at a single site), common (species that occur at both sites) and total (exclusive and common species combined) sampled tree species from the two sites. The exclusive, common and total sampled tree species had a lower SLA when growing at the burnt site than at the unburnt site. Soil from the burnt site was less fertile than the soil from the unburnt site, and the plants from the burnt site exhibited lower leaf nutrient concentrations when compared with those from the unburnt site. The association between fire and soil fertility was consistent with the differences in leaf scleromorphism between the sites under contrasting fire frequencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据