4.4 Article

Pulmonary Hypertension in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Clinical Findings, Cardiovascular Anomalies and Outcomes

期刊

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 49-59

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.22797

关键词

bronchopulmonary dysplasia; pulmonary hypertension; cardiovascular anomalies; premature infants; echocardiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivePulmonary hypertension (PH) worsens the prognosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). The following items have not been fully established for PH in BPD: clinical characterization, incidence of cardiovascular anomalies (CVAs), response to PH treatment, and outcome. Study DesignA review of clinical records, computed tomography (CT) images and catheterization data of 36 patients with PH-BPD referred to our PH Unit (March 2006 to December 2011) was performed. Twenty-nine patients without major congenital heart defects and with complete follow-up data were included. ResultsThe diagnosis of PH was made at a median age of 4.5 months (IQR 2.4-7.8), with an echocardiography estimated median right ventricular pressure/systemic pressure ratio of 70% (IQR 60-80%). CT scanning was performed in 21 patients and catheterization in 14 patients. CVAs were found in 19 patients (65.5%): aortopulmonary collaterals (n=9), pulmonary vein stenosis (n=7), ASD (n=4), and PDA (n=9). Hemodynamic data: PVRI 4.3UWm(2) (2.7-7); PVRI/SVRI 0.44 (0.32-0.8); and transpulmonary gradient 28mmHg (19-40). At a median follow-up of 35 months (IQR 21-91), 6 patients had undergone shunts closure, 22 received specific PH drugs, 3 spontaneously improved of their PH, and 8 (26%) had died. ConclusionPH in BPD is not always a transient condition; it can be diagnosed at later stages and can have a protracted course. The incidence of associated CVAs is high. Prompt diagnosis, detection, and treatment of CVAs, and specific drug therapy can improve the outcome in these patients, although the mortality rate remains high. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014; 49:49-59. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据