4.4 Article

Is Prematurity Associated With Adult Cognitive Outcome and Brain Structure?

期刊

PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 12-20

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.07.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [110 143, 212 848, 214 273]
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  4. NARSAD
  5. Radiological Society of Finland
  6. Oy H. Lundbeck Ab Finland
  7. AstraZeneca Oy
  8. Finnish Medical Foundation
  9. MRC [G0701911] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [G0701911] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have indicated that preterm birth and low birth weight are associated with structural brain abnormalities and neurocognitive deficits in childhood and adolescence, although very few studies have included follow-up in adulthood. Here we assessed the effect of preterm delivery (524 subjects; mean 34.6 weeks, S.D. = 1.7) or low birth weight (366 subjects; mean 2159 g, S.D. = 303) on educational and occupational outcomes at age 31 years in the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort, along with 10,132 term, normal birth weight control subjects. Cognitive tests and brain morphology using magnetic resonance imaging were assessed at age 33-35 years in a subset of the cohort (9 subjects; 95 controls). The preterm or low birth weight subjects had slightly lower school ratings and lower educational levels in adulthood, and they performed worse in verbal learning. The low birth weight subjects were less likely to be employed. There were no mean differences in the magnetic resonance imaging tissue segmentation analysis of the brain. In conclusion, although there were no overall changes in brain morphology in the preterm or low birth weight group, there was evidence for slightly poorer educational and occupational careers and cognitive capacity, which may reflect functional disruption not evident in structure. (C) 2011 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据