4.4 Article

Influence of seasonal variation on blood pressure measurements in children, adolescents and young adults

期刊

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 2343-2349

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-013-2562-0

关键词

High potential; Seasonal variation; Climate; Temperature; Paediatrics; Middle Europe

资金

  1. Merck Serono
  2. Lilly
  3. Novo Nordisk
  4. Pfizer
  5. Ipsen
  6. Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig, Leipziger Forschungszentrum fur Zivilisationserkrankungen (LIFE)
  7. Kompetenznetz Adipositas Leipzig (LARGE)
  8. BMBF, Berlin
  9. LIFE-Research Centre
  10. Leipzig
  11. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seasonal fluctuations in outdoor temperature have been shown to affect blood pressure in adults. The aim of our study was to determine whether blood pressure measurements in children and adolescents in Central Europe undergo seasonal variation or are influenced by outdoor temperature. The blood pressure of 6,714 subjects (3,497 boys, 3,237 girls) aged 3 to 21 (median age 10.6) years was routinely measured. The study cohort comprised both healthy and sick children and adolescents visiting outpatient clinics and during hospitalisation. Cross-sectional analysis showed a significant seasonal variation in blood pressure measurements. The mean increase of systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 4.45/2.42 mmHg during the winter. A significant correlation between average outdoor temperature and systolic blood pressure was found (rho = -0.074 p < 0.001). However, the effect was only detectable at an average temperature below 0 A degrees C/32 A degrees F and above 10 A degrees C/50 A degrees F. For each 1 A degrees C increase in average outdoor temperature, the systolic blood pressure fell by 0.12 mmHg. Blood pressure measurements in children and adolescents, even in a temperate climate, are influenced by temperature and subject to seasonal variation. Considering seasonal variations in blood pressure could be of clinical interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据