4.4 Article

Trends in pediatric primary membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis costs and complications

期刊

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 2243-2250

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-012-2249-y

关键词

Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; Pediatric nephrology; Hospitalization; Cost

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Data on pediatric membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) epidemiology, complications, and healthcare costs are critical to our understanding of MPGN's economic burden and of how best to direct clinical care and research efforts in the future. Methods We analyzed 10-year trends in epidemiology, complications, and hospital charges for pediatric primary MPGN hospitalizations using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) for 1997-2006. We identified approximately 320 primary MPGN admissions per year, corresponding to approximately 4.3 % of all glomerular disease admissions. Results Older children were at higher risk for admission (odds ratios for ages 6-10, 11-15, and 16-18 years were 7.5, 9.3, and 4.7, respectively compared to 0-5 years; p < 0.0001). Gender, race, income, hospital location, and admission season were not significant risk factors. The incidence of MPGN admission-associated acute renal failure (ARF) increased to > 147 % (from < 3 to 7.4 %) over time, while admission-associated renal biopsy (approx. 34.8 %), renal replacement therapy (approx. 18.4 %), and transplantation (approx. 5 %) remained constant. Hospital length of stay (LOS) increased by 68 % (from 5.0 to 8.4 days), whereas mean total hospital charges increased by 213 % (from $13,718 to $42,891), concomitant with a strong trend from private toward public health insurance. Conclusions We conclude that while the incidence of pediatric primary MPGN hospitalizations has remained stable over the last 10 years, they have been associated with marked increases in the frequency of ARF, as well as dramatically increased hospital LOS and charges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据