4.4 Review

The origin of interstitial myofibroblasts in chronic kidney disease

期刊

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 183-193

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-011-1772-6

关键词

Fibrosis; EMT; Myofibroblast; Chronic kidney disease; Genetic fate mapping

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GR 3301/4-1]
  2. German Kidney Foundation
  3. German Society of Hypertension
  4. University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg
  5. Institute for Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine, Seattle, WA [DK73299, DK84077, DK87389]
  6. NIH [DK88923, DK84316, DK73628]
  7. Harvard Stem Cell Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic kidney diseases (CKD), independent of their primary cause, lead to progressive, irreversible loss of functional renal parenchyma. Renal pathology in CKD is characterized by tubulointerstitial fibrosis with excessive matrix deposition produced by myofibroblasts. Because blocking the formation of these scar-forming cells represents a logical therapeutic target for patients with progressive fibrotic kidney disease, the origin of renal myofibroblasts is a subject of intense investigation. Although the traditional view holds that resident fibroblasts are the myofibroblast precursor, for the last 10 years, injured epithelial cells have been thought to directly contribute to the myofibroblast pool by the process of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The recent application of genetic fate mapping techniques in mouse fibrosis models has provided new insights into the cell hierarchies in fibrotic kidney disease and results cast doubt on the concept that EMT is a source of myofibroblast recruitment in vivo, but rather point to the resident pericyte/perivascular fibroblast as the myofibroblast progenitor pool. This review will highlight recent findings arguing against EMT as a direct contributor to the kidney myofibroblast population and review the use of genetic fate mapping to elucidate the cellular mechanisms of kidney homeostasis and disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据