4.5 Article

Nonprotective Responses to Pediatric Vaccines Occur in Children Who Are Otitis Prone

期刊

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
卷 32, 期 11, 页码 1163-1168

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31829e887e

关键词

vaccination; immunity; acute otitis media; pertussis; polio; hepatitis B; pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; dipththeria; tetanus; Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine; immune deficiency

资金

  1. NIH NIDCD [RO1 08671]
  2. Thrasher Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We recently found that children who experience recurrent otitis media despite individualized care (stringently-defined otitis prone [sOP]) do not develop an antibody response to several vaccine candidate protein antigens expressed by Streptococcus pneumonia (Spn) and Haemophilus influenzae. Here we sought to determine if these same children also failed to develop antibody to routine pediatric vaccinations. Study Design: One hundred forty sera collected from children age 6-24 months were analyzed. sOP (n = 34) and age-matched non-sOP (n = 34) children were assessed for IgG concentrations to diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin (DTaP), polio, hepatitis B, H. influenzae type b capsule polyribosyl-ribitol-phosphate (PRP) and Spn capsular polysaccharide conjugate vaccine. Results: IgG protective titers to diphtheria toxoid (P = 0.006), tetanus toxoid (P < 0.0001), pertussis toxoid (P < 0.0001), filamentous hemagglutinin (P = 0.001), pertactin (P = 0.005), hepatitis B (P < 0.0001), polio 3 (P = 0.03) and Spn 23F (P = 0.01) but not polio 1,2, PRP or Spn 6B, and 14 were decreased in sOP versus non-sOP children using generalized estimating equations. A high percentage of sOP children had nonprotective antibody values that persisted until 24 months of age despite routine boosters. Conclusion: sOP children may fail to achieve protective antibody concentrations after several routine vaccinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据