4.5 Article

Nasopharyngeal Carriage of Individual Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotypes During Pediatric Pneumonia as a Means to Estimate Serotype Disease Potential

期刊

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 227-233

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181f87802

关键词

community-acquired pneumonia; children; chest x-ray; clinical; laboratory characteristics

资金

  1. Pfizer (Wyeth)
  2. GSK
  3. Berna/Crucell
  4. Wyeth
  5. MSD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We aimed at estimating pneumococcal serotype-specific disease potential in pediatric community-acquired alveolar pneumonia (CAAP), by comparing nasopharyngeal pneumococcal carriage during disease to carriage in healthy children. Methods: Pneumococcal nasopharyngeal cultures were obtained from children <5 years old admitted to the emergency room or hospitalized with radiologically diagnosed CAAP and from healthy controls. Disease potential was estimated by calculating serotype-specific odds ratios (OR) of a given serotype to be carried during disease compared with healthy children (after adjustment for age, ethnicity, previous antibiotic therapy, and season). Results: A total of 603 and 1504 isolates were obtained from CAAP and healthy children, respectively. A significant OR >1.0 of a specific serotype being carried during disease (suggesting a higher disease potential) was observed with serotypes (by decreasing rank) 1, 5, 22F, 7F, 14, 9V, and 19A. A significant OR <1.0 of being carried during disease (suggesting a lower disease potential) was observed with serotypes 6A, 6B, 23A, and 35B. Carriage of PCV7 serotypes (grouped) during CAAP was highest in age group 6 to 17 months. PCV10 and PCV13 provided significantly higher coverage for both 6 to 17 and 18 to 35 month age groups. Conclusions: It is suggested that serotypes 1, 5, 7F, 9V, 14, 19A, and 22F have a higher disease potential for childhood pneumonia than do serotypes 6A, 6B, 23A, and 35B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据