4.5 Article

Emerging Data on the Safety and Efficacy of Influenza Vaccines in Children

期刊

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 S159-S161

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31818a545d

关键词

influenza vaccination; live influenza vaccine; adjuvants; wheezing; vaccine safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) has limited efficacy in young children, particularly those who are immunologically naive at the time of vaccination. Intranasally administered live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) offers several advantages over TIV. LAIV is more convenient to administer and has shown superior protective efficacy in children as compared with TIV. A pivotal multicenter efficacy trial in 6- to 59-month-old children revealed that the relative efficacy of LAW versus TIV against culture-confirmed influenza-like illness was 55%. This study also showed increased wheezing in 1-2% of LAIV-trcated infants <24 months of age with a history of wheezing/asthma between days 10 and 28 postvaccination. Infants 6-11 months of age had ail increased rate of hospitalization overall (3.5% increase) and hospitalization due to respiratory cause (2% increase). LAIV should be considered for reasons of efficacy, the preferred influenza vaccine for children. However, safety concerns will limit its use in children <24 months of age. An alternative method for improving efficacy of influenza vaccination might be the use of adjuvanted injectable vaccine. A pilot study with MF59 adjuvanted vaccine has shown it to offer superior immunogenicity over conventional TIV, and further Studies are in progress. We are living through ail active period of influenza vaccine development. The threat of an influenza pandemic has resulted in increased influenza research in general and promoted development of seasonal influenza vaccines for children. This article will focus mainly on the efficacy of live attenuated intranasal influenza vaccine as an option in young children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据