4.1 Article

Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine to Reduce Pain and Distress Associated With Propofol Infusion in Pediatric Patients During Procedural Sedation

期刊

PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 13-16

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b227e

关键词

lidocaine; propofol; pain; pediatric procedural sedation; visual analog scale

资金

  1. Akron Children s Hospital Foundation Research Fund, Akron, OH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Research suggests that young children experience an increased incidence and severity of discomfort during propofol infusion. Evaluations of varied interventions to reduce or eliminate this discomfort with adult subjects suggest that premedication with intravenously administered lidocaine (0.5 mg/kg) offers the best overall effectiveness. Objective: Because this regimen's efficacy in a pediatric population is undocumented, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine pretreatment to alleviate pain in pediatric subjects before propofol infusion. Methods: Subjects (aged 2-7 years) scheduled for painless diagnostic procedures received either a saline placebo or 1 of 2 lidocaine doses before administering propofol. To capture the patient's baseline behavioral state, a trained observer administered the validated Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Pain Assessment Scale before propofol infusion. During deep sedation induction, the sedating physician, a trained research assistant, and the patient's parent documented maximum distress using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Ninety-one subjects participated. We found no difference in VAS pain scores between groups pretreated with lidocaine 0.25 mg/kg, lidocaine 0.5 mg/kg, and placebo. Statistical analysis also found no interrater differences between parents, physician, or observer VAS scores. Conclusions: Our data do not support using lidocaine pretreatment to alleviate pain/discomfort in pediatric patients during propofol infusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据