4.1 Article

Needle-Free Jet Injection of Lidocaine for Local Anesthesia During Lumbar Puncture A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 687-690

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825d210b

关键词

pain; lumbar puncture; local anesthesia; needle-free jet injection; buffered lidocaine

资金

  1. Phoenix Children's Hospital Fellowship Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Lumbar puncture (LP) is an essential procedure in the emergency department (ED) for the evaluation of meningitis. Subcutaneous injection of lidocaine before LP for local anesthesia is not a pain-free procedure. The J-Tip device allows an intradermal needle-free jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine. This study compares needle-free jet injection of lidocaine to saline in reducing pain before LP in infants. Methods: This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial involving infants, younger than 3 months, presenting to the ED meeting clinical criteria for LP. All patients were administered the J-Tip and randomized to either treatment with 1% buffered lidocaine or an equivalent amount of sterile normal saline before LP. Vital signs were recorded during the procedure. Facial expressions as well as crying times were video recorded from start to finish. Independent reviewers assigned pain scores based on the validated Neonatal Facial Coding System with possible scores ranging from 0 to 5. Results: A total of 55 patients were enrolled. Mean (SD) pain scores at the time of needle insertion were 4.1 (1.3) for the lidocaine group and 4.8 (0.5) for the saline group (P = 0.01). Length of cry was also shorter for those in the lidocaine group, 38.5 versus 48.8 seconds (P = 0.04). Overall, kappa was 0.76 between 2 independent reviewers. Conclusions: Needle-free injection of 1% buffered lidocaine administered before needle insertion for LP in infants reduces pain and length of cry, compared with normal saline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据