4.1 Article

Initial Base Deficit as Predictors for Mortality and Transfusion Requirement in the Severe Pediatric Trauma Except Brain Injury

期刊

PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 579-581

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181b9b38a

关键词

shock; mortality; blood transfusion; trauma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The initial base deficit (BD) is an important indicator of shock in adult trauma patients, but its value is unclear in pediatric trauma patients. This study assessed the ability of the initial BD to predict mortality and blood transfusion requirements in children except severe brain injury patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of pediatric patients with severe trauma arriving at the emergency department of a university hospital from January 1998 to June 2005. Blood pressure, the initial BD, and the Injury Severity Score were assessed as independent predictors of mortality and the blood transfusion requirement using multiple regression analysis. Results: The study group constituted 102 patients. According to the multiple regression analysis results, the initial systolic blood pressure, Injury Severity Score, and blood transfusion requirement were not independent predictors of mortality (P = 0.104, 0.959, 0.386, respectively). By contrast, the initial BD was an independent predictor, with all odds ratio of 13.6 for BD of -8 mEq/L or less (confidence interval [CI], 3.51-35.23, P = 0.037), and systolic blood pressure and BD were independent predictors of blood transfusion requirement; the odds ratio for hypotension was 3.2 (Cl, 0.51-8.32, P = 0.044), and the odds ratio was 15.3 for BD values of -8 or less (Cl, 2.24-51.43, P = 0.003), Conclusion: The initial BD in pediatric trauma patients except severe brain injury was an independent predictor of mortality and blood transfusion requirement within 24 hours. Mortality and blood transfusion requirement were significantly high when initial BD was less than -8 mEq/L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据