4.4 Article

Vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide in patients with relapsed and refractory Ewing sarcoma

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 60, 期 10, 页码 1621-1625

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24621

关键词

irinotecan; refractory Ewing sarcoma; temozolomide

资金

  1. Children's Medical Care Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Patients with metastatic, progressive or recurrent Ewing sarcoma (ES) have a dismal outcome. The combination of irinotecan and temozolomide has been proposed as an effective salvage regimen for some pediatric malignancies. Thus, we sought to evaluate this combination with vincristine for patients with relapsed and refractory ES. Materials and Methods Twenty-two patients with relapsed or refractory ES were treated with the combination of vincristine (1.5mg/m(2) i.v. day 1), irinotecan (50mg/m(2)/day i.v. days 1-5) and temozolomide (125mg/m(2)/day p.o. days 1-5) (VIT) during the period 2008-2012. All toxicities were documented. Results A total of 91 cycles (median 4.1 cycles/patient) were administered. A complete response (CR) was achieved in five patients, partial response (PR) in seven patients, stable disease (SD) in three patients, and progression disease (PD) in seven patients, with an overall response rate of 68.1%. Median time to progression was 3.0 months (range 1.1-37.1 months). Five patients (22.7%) are alive with no evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range 2.1-46.5); four of them received consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant after responding to VIT. Outcome was better for patients with relapsed ES compared with patients who progressed to initial therapy (estimated 2 year overall survival 36.4% vs. 0%, respectively). There were no significant toxicities. Conclusions The shorter, 5-day VIT regimen is an active and well-tolerated regimen in refractory ES. This combination deserves further investigation in the upfront management of patients with metastatic disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013;60:1621-1625. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据