4.4 Article

Risk factors for cisplatin-associated ototoxicity in pediatric oncology patients

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 59, 期 1, 页码 144-148

出版社

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24138

关键词

cisplatin; hearing loss; ototoxicity; risk factors

资金

  1. NIH/NIDCD [T32 DC00012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Cisplatin is an effective chemotherapy agent against several pediatric malignancies. One of its side effects is irreversible sensorineural hearing damage that is highly variable with a reported incidence of 2270%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and identify clinical predictors of cisplatin-related ototoxicity. Procedures We performed a retrospective chart review of 102 pediatric patients who had completed cisplatin therapy for osteosarcoma, neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma, or germ cell tumor. Patients were diagnosed at Riley Hospital for Children between January 1995 and June 2008, were less than 18 years old at diagnosis, and had normal hearing prior to therapy. Audiograms were scored using the Brock scale (04), a validated grading system for cisplatin-related hearing loss. Results Forty-two percent of the patients experienced hearing loss and 28% had moderate to severe ototoxicity (Brock score =2). Males were at significantly greater risk for developing hearing loss than were females (P?=?0.005, OR 4.812). Age at cancer diagnosis was inversely related to severity of ototoxicity. Patients who suffered Brock grade 3 ototoxicity had a mean age of 4.5 years versus 11.5 years and 7.2 years for grades 1 and 2, respectively (P?=?0.02). Cumulative cisplatin dose was also identified as a risk factor for development of ototoxicity (P?=?0.03). Conclusions Gender and cumulative dose are important clinical biomarkers of cisplatin ototoxicity. Severity of ototoxicity may be inversely related to age at time of exposure, with very young patients exhibiting higher grades of hearing loss following cisplatin therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 59: 144148. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据