4.4 Article

Hyperfiltration Evaluated by Glomerular Filtration Rate at Diagnosis in Children with Cancer

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 56, 期 5, 页码 762-766

出版社

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22971

关键词

children; glomerular filtration rate; hyperfiltration; iohexol clearance; malignancy

资金

  1. Children's Cancer Fund of Sweden
  2. Lund University
  3. Ellen Greta Jonsson's Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of pediatric cancer patients at diagnosis has previously been investigated in a limited number of studies. Procedure. GFR, measured by iohexol clearance, was prospectively investigated in 55 children over the age of 1 year with malignancies, (group A). Elevated GFR (> 175 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) at diagnosis was found. To investigate if this finding was consistent, a second group of 76 children with malignancies was studied, (group B). As a method control for GFR obtained by iohexol clearance, group A and B together were compared to 298 pediatric patients without cancer, group C. Results. GFR was elevated in 40/131 (31%) in Group A + B but only in 17/298 (6%) in Group C. GFR was significantly higher in children aged 1-5 in group A + B (47%) compared to group C( 3%). Bone marrow involvement was significantly associated with higher GFR. Children without bone marrow involvement also hyperfiltrated more often than controls, but less often. Urea in urine was used as a marker of renal protein clearance in 14 patients in group A. A significant correlation between u-urea(mmol/L)/u-creatinine (mmol/L) and GFR was noted. Conclusions. Hyperfiltration is sometimes present in children with cancer at diagnosis. This may be related to increased amino acid turnover in patients with a large tumor burden. An elevated initial GFR in a child with cancer, which normalizes after chemotherapy may indicate chemotherapy-induced decreased renal function, but can be due to normalization of an initially high GFR. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011;56:762-766. (c) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据