4.5 Article

Collaborative neighbor representation based classification using l2-minimization approach

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 201-208

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2012.09.024

关键词

Sparse representation; Collaborative representation; Pattern classification; Nearest neighbor representation; Face recognition

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB302201]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [60931160441, 61003042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Applications of sparse signal representation in image processing and pattern recognition have attracted a great deal of attention. Sparse representation based classification (SRC) methods emphasizes on sparse representation computed by l(1)-minimization to exploit the underlying sparsity in the problem domain, and argued the importance of sparse representation that improved the discrimination to achieve robust and accurate classification results. Recently, many studies have shown the role of collaborative representation (CR) in SRC, which actually improved the classification accuracy. In this paper, we proposed a novel collaborative neighbor representation method for multi-class classification based on l(2)-minimization approach with the assumption of locally linear embedding (LLE). The proposed method represents a test sample over the dictionary by automatically choosing optimal nearest basis spanned in the same linear subspace as of test sample. The proposed representation method achieves competitive classification accuracy via optimal neighbor representation having discriminative learning power. Extensive experiments on real-world face and digit databases are performed to analyze the performance of the proposed method against SRC methods. Result clearly shows that the proposed method achieves competitive results for face recognition and pattern classification, and is significantly much faster and comparably accurate than SRC based classification methods. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据