4.6 Article

Adipose-and Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Prolong Graft Survival in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 99, 期 9, 页码 1765-1773

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000731

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Strategies aiming at minimization or elimination of systemic immunosuppression are key immediate goals for clinical expansion of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). We compared the in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory efficacy of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) and bone marrow (BM)-derived MSCs in a rat VCA model. Methods. Both cell types were tested in vitro for suppressor function using mixed lymphocyte reactivity assays. AD-MSCs or BM-MSCs were administered intravenously (1 x 10(6) or 5 x 10(6) cells/animal) to Lewis rat recipients of mismatched Brown Norway hindlimb transplants. Short course tacrolimus (FK-506) monotherapy was withdrawn at postoperative day 21. In vivo regulatory T-cell induction, peripheral blood chimerism, and microchimerism in lymphatic organs were analyzed. Results. AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs exhibited strong dose-dependent suppressor function in vitro, which was significantly more pronounced for AD cells. In vivo, all animals revealed peripheralmulti-lineage chimerism at four weeks (P < 0.01) independent of cell type and dosage. Regulatory T-cell levels were increased with both cell types, the most in AD-MSC groups. These immunomodulatory effects were only transient. MSC treatment resulted in long-term (>120 day) allograft survival in 47% of the animals, which correlated with durable microchimerism in BM and spleen. Conclusions. AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs exert immunomodulatory effects that prolong survival of immunogenic skin-bearing VCA grafts with short course (21 day) tacrolimus induction therapy. The in vivo findings in terms of allograft survival did not reflect superior immunomodulatory characteristics of AD-MSCs found in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据