4.5 Article

Communicating with diverse patients: How patient and clinician factors affect disparities

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 101, 期 12, 页码 2186-2194

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.021

关键词

Minority health; Health disparities; Patient-clinician communication

资金

  1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health [K99MD011755]
  2. Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Patient-clinician communication (PCC) may generate or reduce healthcare disparities. This paper is based on the 2017 International Conference on Communication in Healthcare keynote address and reviews PCC literature as a research area for the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD). Methods: A narrative review of selected evidence on disparities in PCC experienced by race and ethnic minorities, associations between PCC and poor health outcomes, and patient and clinician factors related to PCC. Results: Factors associated with poor quality PCC on the patient level include being a member of racial/ethnic minority, having limited English proficiency, and low health and digital literacy; on the clinician level, being less culturally competent, lacking communication skills to facilitate shared decision-making, and holding unconscious biases. Recommendations include offering patient- and/or clinician-targeted interventions to guard against unconscious biases and improve PCC, screening patients for health literacy and English proficiency, integrating PCC in performance processes, and leveraging health information technologies to address unconscious biases. Conclusion: EffectivePCC is a pathway to decrease health disparities and promote health equity. Practice implications: Standardized collection of social determinants of health in the Electronic Health Record is an importantfirst step in promoting more effective PCC. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据