期刊
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 96, 期 3, 页码 295-301出版社
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.017
关键词
Shared decision making; Patient perceptions; Qualitative interviews; Primary care decision-making
资金
- University of Texas School of Public Health Cancer Education and Career Development Program (National Cancer Institute/NIH) [R25 CA57712]
- National Institute on Aging [1F31AG040923-01]
- Center for Health Communications Research at the University of Michigan [5P50CA101451-09]
Objective: This study aims to develop a conceptual model of patient-defined SDM, and understand what leads patients to label a specific, decision-making process as shared. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 primary care patients following a recent appointment. Patients were asked about the meaning of SDM and about specific decisions that they labeled as shared. Interviews were coded using qualitative content analysis. Results: Patients' conceptual definition of SDM included four components of an interactive exchange prior to making the decision: both doctor and patient share information, both are open-minded and respectful, patient self-advocacy, and a personalized physician recommendation. Additionally, a long-term trusting relationship helps foster SDM. In contrast, when asked about a specific decision labeled as shared, patients described a range of interactions with the only commonality being that the two parties came to a mutually agreed-upon decision. Conclusion: There is no one-size-fits all process that leads patients to label a decision as shared. Rather, the outcome of agreement may be more important than the actual decision-making process for patients to label a decision as shared. Practice implications: Studies are needed to better understand how longitudinal communication between patient and physicians and patient self-advocacy behaviors affect patient perceptions of SDM. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据