4.5 Article

Patients with Type 2 Diabetes experiences of making multiple lifestyle changes: A qualitative study

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 74, 期 2, 页码 258-263

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.018

关键词

Diabetes; Exercise; Multiple lifestyle changes; Qualitative research

资金

  1. Medical Research Committee of the Charitable Trusts for the United Bristol Hospitals
  2. Avon Primary Care Research Collaborative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To explore patients newly diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) experiences of making single (diet) or multiple (diet and physical activity) changes in order to (1) assess whether patients experienced increases in physical activity as supporting or hindering dietary changes and vice versa, and (2) whether patients found making multiple lifestyle changes counterproductive or beneficial. Methods: in-depth interviews with 30 individuals taking part in a randomised controlled trial that aimed to determine the effect of diet and physical activity on T2DM. Interviewees had been randomised to receive usual care, intensive dietary advice, or intensive dietary advice plus information on physical activity. Respondents were interviewed 6 and 9 months post-randomisation. They were asked about their experiences of making lifestyle changes. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Findings suggest providing diet and physical activity information together encourages patients to use physical activity in strategic ways to aid disease management and that most patients find undertaking multiple lifestyle changes helpful. Conclusion: Increasing physical activity can act as a gateway behaviour, i.e. behaviour that produces positive effects in other behaviours. Practice implications: Practitioners should provide diet and physical activity information together to encourage patients to use physical activity strategically to maintain dietary changes. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据