4.5 Article

Enhancement of daily physical activity increases physical fitness of outclinic COPD patients: Results of an exercise counseling program

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 274-278

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.005

关键词

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Daily physical activity; Pedometer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate whether a 12-week pedometer-based exercise counseling strategy is feasible and effectively enhances daily physical activity in outclinic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients who do not participate in a rehabilitation program in a controlled way. Methods: 35 outclinic COPI) patients (21 males. mean age 62 years, GOLD I-III, mean FEV1% predicted 64.7) were randomized for a 12-week individual pedometer-based exercise counseling program promoting daily physical activities or usual care. Daily physical activity (DigiWalker SW-200), physical fitness, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, fatigue, depression and motivation to be physically active were assessed before and after the intervention. Results: After the intervention, COPD patients in the exercise counseling group showed a significant increase in their mean number of steps/day (from 7087 to 7872), whereas the usual care group showed a decrease (from 7539 to 6172). Significant differences favoring the exercise counseling group were demonstrated in arm strength, leg strength, health-related quality of life and intrinsic motivation to be physically active. Conclusion: Our study shows that a 12-week pedometer-based exercise counseling strategy is feasible and effectively enhances daily physical activity, physical fitness, health-related quality of life and intrinsic motivation in outclinic COPD patients who do not participate in a rehabilitation program. Practice implications: The feasibility of our exercise counseling strategy is good and patients were motivated to participate. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据