4.4 Article

ABCC2 (MRP2, cMOAT) Localized in the Nuclear Envelope of Breast Carcinoma Cells Correlates with Poor Clinical Outcome

期刊

PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 331-342

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-011-9449-9

关键词

ABCC2; Breast cancer; Immunohistochemistry; Prognosis

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Poland) [0638/B/P01/2008/35]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear expression of ABCC2 can be specific for lower differentiated cells and stem cells. The study aimed at examination of ABCC2 expression in breast cancers. The immunohistochemical analyses were performed on 70 samples of breast cancer. We have also studied prognostic value of the ABCC2 mRNA expression using the KM plotter which assessed the effect of 22,277 genes on survival in 1809 breast cancer patients. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated that ABCC2 expression may be manifested in nuclear envelope of neoplastic cells (ABCC2n) as well as in their cell membrane and cytoplasm (ABCC2c). The univariate and multivariate analyses showed that higher expression of ABCC2n and ABCC2c was typical for cases of a shorter overall survival time. Higher ABBC2n expression was also typical for cases of a shorter disease-free survival and a shorter progression-free time. The KM plotter analysis of the prognostic value of ABCC2 mRNA expression showed that elevated ABCC2 expression was specific for cases of a shorter relapse-free survival only in the estrogen receptor-negative subgroup. The study demonstrated hat breast cancers manifest ABCC2 expression and that it is linked to a less favourable prognosis. Our results suggested that immunohistochemical tests represent a reliable way to detect prognostic value of ABCC2 expression, allowing to demonstrate differences related to subcellular localization of the protein. Cases with nuclear expression of ABCC2 manifested a more aggressive clinical course, which might reflect a less advanced differentiation of neplastic cells, resistance to the applied cytostatic drugs and tamoxifen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据