4.5 Article

Expression of BDNF, TrkB, and p53 in early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix

期刊

PATHOLOGY
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 453-458

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e3283484a3a

关键词

TrkB; BDNF; p53; cervix; squamous cell carcinoma

资金

  1. Kyung Hee University [KHU-20100652]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: TrkB and BDNF play a critical role in cancer invasion and metastasis. We investigated the potential role of these proteins, together with p53, in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix by focusing on the clinicopathological correlation and outcome. Methods: We performed RT-PCR analysis of TrkB and BDNF mRNA expression in cervical cancer cell lines, as well as tumour and normal tissue of the cervix. We analysed TrkB, BDNF, and p53 protein expression using immunohistochemistry in 80 patients with cervical SCC. Results: The expression of BDNF and TrkB mRNA was higher in human cervical cancer cell lines and SCC tissues than in normal tissues. Positive TrkB expression was significantly correlated with low FIGO stage (p = 0.032), low T stage (p = 0.027), less than 1/2 stromal invasion of the cervix (p = 0.018), 4cm or smaller for the greatest dimension of the tumour (p = 0.015) and absent lymphatic invasion (p = 0.032). Positive BDNF expression was significantly related to low FIGO stage (p = 0.001), less than 1/2 stromal invasion of the cervix (p = 0.040), absent lymphatic invasion (p = 0.026), and absent lymph node metastasis (p = 0.003). In contrast, p53 expression was significantly related to advanced T stage (p = 0.001), greater than 4cm for the greatest dimension of the tumour (p = 0.002), more than 1/2 stromal invasion of the cervix (p = 0.005), and poor survival (p = 0.0218). Conclusions: TrkB and BDNF expression might play a significant role in the early events in tumorigenesis of cervical SCC. However, p53 is involved late in the process of tumour progression and therefore is predictive of a poor prognosis in SCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据