4.4 Article

Matrix Metalloproteinase-13 Promotes Recovery from Experimental Liver Cirrhosis in Rats

期刊

PATHOBIOLOGY
卷 78, 期 5, 页码 239-252

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000328841

关键词

Fibrosis; Matrix metalloproteinase(s); Interstitial collagenase; Adenoviral gene transfer; Extracellular matrix; Hepatocyte growth factor

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  2. Academy of Finland [114409, 130224]
  3. Finnish Cancer Research Foundation
  4. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  5. Turku University Hospital
  6. Cancer Foundation Finland sr [110087, 100104] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the role of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-13 gene expression in the early phase of recovery from liver fibrosis/cirrhosis. Methods: Liver fibrosis was induced in male Wistar rats by administration of carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4)) for 10 weeks. Recombinant adenovirus-mediated human MMP-13 gene transfer (RAdMMP-13) was performed via the femoral vein on day 3 after the last CCl(4) injection. The role of MMP-13 in stably expressing cell lines was also analyzed. Results: Fibrous deposition in the liver was decreased in RAdMMP-13-injected rats by day 3 after gene transfer compared with empty vector RAd66-injected rats. Furthermore, MMP-2 and MMP-9 enzymatic activity was markedly enhanced in the liver of RAdMMP-13 injected rats. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) induction was also increased in RAdMMP-13 injected rats. In established stable HT-1080 cells transfected with MMP-13, HGF-alpha expression and MMP-2 and MMP-9 enzymatic activity were increased. The conversion of precursor HGF into mature HGF was also increased in the MMP-13 expressing cell lines. Conclusion: Forced MMP-13 expression effectively accelerated recovery from liver cirrhosis via the effects of MMP-13-mediated HGF, MMP-2, and MMP-9 expression, which induced the degradation of collagen fibers and promoted hepatic regeneration. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据