4.3 Article

Mechanically Robust, Electrically Conductive Biocomposite Films Using Antimicrobial Chitosan-Functionalized Graphenes

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201300044

关键词

antimicrobial activity; biocomposites; graphene; mechanical properties; nitrene chemistry

资金

  1. MEXT [24310088]
  2. Research Center for Exotic NanoCarbon Project, Japan Regional Innovation Strategy Program by the Excellence, JST
  3. KIST Institutional Program
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  5. Korea government (MEST) [2012R1A2A2A01015155]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A2A2A01015155] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective way of covalently functionalizing graphene with a chitosan polymer via a nitrene chemistry is demonstrated. The biofunctionalized graphene is prepared by the chemical reduction of graphene oxide using a nitrene chemistry, and then covalently grafting chitosan to the graphene surface. The effectiveness of the biofunctionalized graphene as a reinforcing filler (4 wt%) in a chitosan polymer matrix is verified by the dramatic enhancement of the mechanical properties (breaking stress = 330%, Young's modulus = 243%) and the electrical conductivity (0.3 S m(-1)) without much loss in the elongation-at-break. The reinforcing effect can be explained by both the homogeneous dispersion of graphene within the matrix and the strong bond arising from the intrinsically intimate contact between the graphene and the matrix. The high antimicrobial activity of the biofunctionalized graphene compared with graphene oxide and chemically reduced graphene may be because of the presence of chitosan polymer on the edges of the graphene. The strong, antimicrobial graphene-filled composite film can be used for food packaging and for coating various biomedical devices, where bacterial surface colonization is undesirable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据