4.3 Article

Versatile Graphene Quantum Dots with Tunable Nitrogen Doping

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201300268

关键词

substitutional doping; N dopant; photocurrent; photoluminescence; quantum dots

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 program) [2013CB932902]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21201034, 21173042, 21310102005, 51103023]
  3. Educational Commission of Jiangsu Province [JHB2011-2]
  4. Science and Technology Support Program (Industry) Project of Jiangsu Province [BE 2013118]
  5. Southeast University Innovation Fund [3207042401]
  6. Center for Excitonics, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports a facile fabrication of N-doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs) showing controllable chemical properties through a hydrothermal treatment. The N-GQDs have a uniform size of 3.06 +/- 0.78 nm and prefer the equilibrium shapes of circle and ellipse due to the minimization of edge free energy. The N/C atomic ratio in N-GQDs can be precisely tailored in a range from 8.3 at% to 15.8 at% by simply controlling the concentration of N source (ammonium hydroxide). One order of magnitude quantum yield of 34.5% is achieved by N-GQDs, compared with the N-free GQDs, as the substitutional N has an essential role in more effective radiative emission. Excessive N dopants in N-GQDs can lead to photoluminescence quenching, through nonradiative transition back to the ground state. The N-GQDs are further found to be suitable as photocurrent conversion materials due to benign energy matching with anatase nanofibers, the ultrafast electron injection at their interface, and efficient electron transfer. This work provides an efficient and inspiring approach to engineering both chemical components and physical properties of N-GQDs, and will therefore promote their basic research and applications in energy conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据