4.5 Article

Substantia nigra echogenicity and imaging of striatal dopamine transporters in Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional study

期刊

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 477-481

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.01.015

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Substantia nigra echogenicity; Transcranial sonography; SPELT; Dopamine transporter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Approximately 10% of patients with a presumed diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) remain misdiagnosed despite recent advances in neuroimaging. The current study addresses the use of transcranial sonography and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 to evaluate the echogenicity of the substantia nigra (SN) and the density of striatal presynaptic dopamine transporters, respectively, in a sample of 20 PD patients (13 males and 7 females) and 9 healthy subjects. The median age of the PD patients was 62 years. The median age at disease onset was 56 years, and the median disease duration was 5 years. The SN echogenic area was larger in PD patients than healthy subjects. The cut-off value of 0.22 cm(2) for the SN echogenic area was associated with 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity for the diagnosis of PD. Striatal and putaminal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding was lower in PD patients than healthy subjects. The cut-off value of 0.90 for the striatal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding was associated with 100% sensitivity and an 89% specificity for the diagnosis of PD, and the cut-off value of 0.76 for putaminal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding was associated with an 85% sensitivity and an 89% specificity. The size of the SN echogenic area did not correlate with the degree of striatal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding in PD patients. In conclusion, both SN hyperechogenicity and decreased striatal or putaminal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding constitute surrogate markers for differentiating PD patients from healthy individuals with a slightly higher diagnostic specificity of Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 SPECT. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据