4.5 Article

Lifetime exposure to estrogens and Parkinson's disease in California teachers

期刊

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 1149-1156

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.08.003

关键词

Estrogen; Reproductive; Hormone therapy; Parkinson's; Menopause

资金

  1. American Parkinson's Disease Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is consistently observed to occur less frequently in women than men, prompting investigation into whether estrogen protects against neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons. Methods: We used baseline data in the California Teachers Study, a prospective cohort of women, to investigate whether reproductive factors indicating higher long-term estrogen levels are associated with PD using a nested case-control approach. We identified 228 PD cases and 3349 unaffected controls frequency matched by age and race. Results: Women who reported using combined estrogen/progesterone therapy or progesterone only formulations had a 57% increase in PD risk (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.06, 2.34) compared to never having used HT. Compared to women with menopause at 50-52 years, menopause at younger (<35-46 years: OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37, 0.94) and older ages (>= 53 years: OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.36, 0.83) had lower PD risk. A derived composite estrogen summary score for women's exposure to both endogenous and exogenous estrogens throughout life indicated that women with presumed higher cumulative lifetime levels of estrogen (a score of 3-5) had a significantly reduced PD risk [(OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.91) relative to those with lower lifetime estrogen exposure or a composite estrogen summary score of 0-1]. Conclusions: These results provide some support for the hypothesis that lifelong high estrogen is protective in PD, suggesting that the level and persistence of exposure over the long term may be important in PD risk reduction. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据