4.5 Article

Differentiation of early-stage parkinsonisms using neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging

期刊

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 755-760

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.04.005

关键词

Differential diagnosis; Parkinson's disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neuromelanin; MIBG scintigraphy

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [S0901001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the signal intensity of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and locus coeruleus (LC) on neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can discriminate early-stage parkinsonism disorders, for which differential diagnosis is generally difficult. Methods: Neuromelanin-sensitive MRI at 3 T was performed in 53 patients with early parkinsonism and 22 healthy controls. After an observation period of >1.5 year, the patients were clinically diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD; n = 30), multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P; n = 10), or progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome (PSPS; n = 13). The signal intensity of the lateral, central, and medial parts of the SNc and the LC were measured and the contrast ratios (CR) against adjacent white-matter structures was calculated. Results: The CR of the lateral SNc was lower in the PD and MSA-P groups than in the PSPS and control groups (p = 0.0001-0.05). The CR of the LC was lower in the PD group than in the other groups (p = 0.0001-0.05). Sensitivity and specificity of the CRs for discriminating PD from MSA-P was 60% and 90%, respectively, those for PD/PSPS were 63-88% and 77-92%, respectively, and those for MSA-P/PSPS were 80% and 85%, respectively. These properties were comparable or better to MIBG scintigraphy. Conclusions: Neuromelanin-sensitive MRI can depict differences in signal intensity of the lateral SNc and the LC among the parkinsonism disorders at their early stages. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据