4.5 Article

Motor and non-motor symptoms of 1453 patients with Parkinson's disease: Prevalence and risks

期刊

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 725-731

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.04.001

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Natural history studies; Wearing-off; Camptocormia; Psychosis

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25461290] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We examined the prevalence and risk of clinical symptoms in a large number of Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) (n = 1453; 650 males). Methods: Events were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, logistic regression, and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: The mean age (SD) was 67.7 (10.0), age of onset was 58.0 (11.5), and disease duration was 9.7 (6.6) years. The mean modified Hoehn and Yahr stage was 2.8 (1.2). Most patients (88.9%) received levodopa (547.7 (257.6) mg/day). A large proportion (81.3%) received dopamine agonists (136.2 (140.7) mg/day). About 23.4% received pain treatment 6.9 (5.1) years after the onset; females (p < 0.05) and patients with late-onset PD (>= 60 years, p < 0.001) were more likely to be affected. About 44.7% of patients had wearing-off 7.5 (4.7) years after the onset, and it was more common in females (p < 0.001) and patients with early-onset PD (p < 0.001). Camptocormia was found in 9.5% of patients 8.1 (6.2) years after the onset, and it was more common in females (p < 0.05) and patients with late-onset PD (p < 0.05). About 28.6% of patients developed psychosis 9.0 (5.4) years after the onset, and it was more likely to occur in patients with late-onset PD (p < 0.001). Late-onset PD and cerebrovascular disease were also associated with increased risk of pneumonia. Conclusions: Considering that very few studies have assessed numerous clinical symptoms in the same report, these data provide a useful reference for the clinical course of PD. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据