4.3 Article

Toxoplasma gondii microneme protein 8 (MIC8) is a potential vaccine candidate against toxoplasmosis

期刊

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 106, 期 5, 页码 1079-1084

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-010-1742-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Special Research Programs [200803017]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0723]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [9451064201003715]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology
  5. Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute
  6. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  7. Key Research Programs in Natural Sciences for Institutions of Higher Education in Guangdong Province [06Z004]
  8. President's Funds of South China Agricultural University [2009K034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microneme protein 8 (MIC8) is considered a new essential invasion factor in Toxoplasma gondii. In the present study, a deoxyribonucleic acid vaccine expressing MIC8 of T. gondii was constructed and the immune response it induced in Kunming mice was evaluated. The gene sequence encoding MIC8 was inserted into the eukaryotic expression vector pVAX I, and the pVAX-MIC8 expression plasmid was constructed, and the plasmid diluted with PBS to l00 mg/100 A mu l was injected into the Kunming mice muscularly. Levels of IgG antibody, gamma-interferon (IFN-gamma), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-4, and interleukin-10 were detected. The mice were challenged with tachyzoites of the virulent T. gondii RH strain at the 14th day after the last immunization to observe the survival time. The high level of IFN-gamma, IL-2, and IgG antibody indicated that mice vaccinated with recombinant pVAX-MIC8 plasmid could elicit strong cellular and humoral immune responses and showed a significantly increased survival time (10.3 A +/- 0.9 days) compared with control mice which died within 5 days of challenge infection. These data demonstrate that the T. gondii MIC8 is a potential vaccine candidate against toxoplasmosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据