4.2 Article

Effect of artemisinin on oocyst wall formation and sporulation during Eimeria tenella infection

期刊

PARASITOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 506-511

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2010.04.001

关键词

Artemisinin; SERCA; Macrogametes; Eimeria tenella; Coccidiosis

资金

  1. Research Council of Aragon Spain [A46]
  2. Spanish National Plan for Scientific Research Development and Technological Innovation (INIA) [RTA2005-00075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anticoccidial effect of a product extracted from the natural herb Artemisia annua artemisinin which has a potential use as a dietary supplement has been studied Commercial artemisinin was administered at 10 and 17 ppm in food and tested against infection with Eimeria tenella A battery trial to quantify the effect of artemisinin on the reproductive and infective capabilities of E tenella was carried out For that purpose flow cytometry was combined with electron microscopy and immunofluorescence techniques in order to study the effect of artemisinin on E tenella gametogenesis Significantly reduced oocyst output and lesion scores were found in chickens treated with artemisinin In addition evidence to support a lower oocyst sporulation rate was obtained Though the ultrastructural studies showed normal development of gametogenesis in artemisinin-treated chickens the oocyst wall formation was significantly altered This resulted in both death of developing oocysts and reduced sporulation rate Immunofluorescent studies provided evidence that treatment with artemisinin inhibited sarcoplasmic-endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA) expression in macrogametes According to these findings artemisinin has a deleterious effect on fertilized macrogametes (early zygotes) by inhibiting SERCA The altered secretion of the wall-forming bodies may be the result of Ca(2+)-dependent ATPase impaired activity which in turn is the result of SERCA inhibition (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据