4.4 Article

Auxin production by the plant trypanosomatid Phytomonas serpens and auxin homoeostasis in infected tomato fruits

期刊

PARASITOLOGY
卷 141, 期 10, 页码 1299-1310

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182014000547

关键词

Indole-3-acetic acid; conjugated auxin; indole-pyruvate decarboxylase; Phytomonas-plant interaction

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2010/50957-1]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [304793/2009-4]
  3. FAPESP [2008/50209-5]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [10/50957-1] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously we have characterized the complete gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC)/indolepyruvate decarboxylase (IPDC) of Phytomonas serpens, a trypanosomatid highly abundant in tomato fruits. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the clade that contains the trypanosomatid protein behaves as a sister group of IPDCs of gamma-proteobacteria. Since IPDCs are key enzymes in the biosynthesis of the plant hormone indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), the ability for IAA production by P. serpens was investigated. Similar to many microorganisms, the production of IAA and related indolic compounds, quantified by high performance liquid chromatography, increased in P. serpens media in response to amounts of tryptophan. The auxin functionality was confirmed in the hypocotyl elongation assay. In tomato fruits inoculated with P. serpens the concentration of free IAA had no significant variation, whereas increased levels of IAA-amide and IAA-ester conjugates were observed. The data suggest that the auxin produced by the flagellate is converted to IAA conjugates, keeping unaltered the concentration of free IAA. Ethanol also accumulated in P. serpens-conditioned media, as the result of a PDC activity. In the article we discuss the hypothesis of the bifunctionality of P. serpens PDC/IPDC and provide a three-dimensional model of the enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据