4.4 Article

Site selection of Acanthochondria cornuta (Copepoda: Chondracanthidae) in Platichthys flesus (Teleostei: Pleuronectidae)

期刊

PARASITOLOGY
卷 138, 期 8, 页码 1061-1067

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182011000606

关键词

Acanthochondria cornuta; site selection; branchial chamber; Platichthys flesus

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
  2. European Social Fund [SFRH/BM/23063/2005, SFRH/BD/65258/2009]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BM/23063/2005, SFRH/BD/65258/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acanthochondria cornuta (Copepoda: Chondracanthidae) (N=4841; prevalence: 80.0%; mean +/- S.D. [range] intensity: 28.8 +/- 24.0 [1-110] parasites) infected the branchial chambers of the European flounder, Platichthys flesus (L.), (N=210) according to an established spatial pattern. This was independent of host size. Higher intensities resulted, most frequently, in higher numbers of infection sites, probably due to increased intraspecific competition. Preferential infection of the ocular side was supported by the recorded abundance data and reflected, probably, the fish's bottom-dwelling behaviour. As the parasite develops from one stage into another, it seems to migrate towards different sites: the copepodites and pre-adult females occurred, mainly, in the holobranchs; the adults preferred the internal wall (non-gravid/post-gravid females; adult males) or the pseudobranchs (gravid females). The ventilating water current along with the blood supply are suggested as 2 major factors in determining parasite spatial distribution within the chamber. Parasite crowding in a restricted and narrow space of the posterior region of the internal wall was recorded frequently and resembled that previously reported for the plaice. Differences to other host-parasite systems previously studied should relate with the anatomy of the respiratory apparatus. Bigamous females are reported for the first time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据