4.4 Article

Biological, ultrastructural effect and subcellular localization of aromatic diamidines in Trypanosoma cruzi

期刊

PARASITOLOGY
卷 137, 期 2, 页码 251-259

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182009991223

关键词

Trypanosoma cruzi; Chagas disease; chemotherapy; aromatic diamidines

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro [APQ1- E26/170.627/07, E-26/110.401/2007]
  3. Conselho Nacional Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [304119/2006-7, 410401/2006-4, 403451/2008-6]
  4. DECIT/SCTIE/MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

No vaccines or safe chemotherapy are available for Chagas disease. Pentamidine and related di-cations are DNA minor groove-binders with broad-spectrum anti-protozoal activity. Therefore our aim was to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of di-cationic compounds - DB1643, DB1582, DB1651, DB1646, DB1670 and DB1627 - against bloodstream trypomastigotes (BT) and intracellular forms of Trypanosoma cruzi. Cellular targets of these compounds in treated parasites were also analysed by fluorescence and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). DB1645, DB1582 and DB1651 where the most active against BT showing IC50 values ranging between 0.15 and 6.9 mu M. All Compounds displayed low toxicity towards mammalian cells and DB1645, DB1582 and DB1651 were also the most effective against intracellular parasites, with IC50 values ranging between 7.3 and 13.3 mu M. All compounds localized in parasite nuclei and kDNA (with greater intensity in the latter structure), and DB1582 and DB1651 also concentrated in non-DNA-containing cytoplasmic organelles possibly acidocalcisomes. TEM revealed alterations in mitochondria and kinetoplasts, as well as important disorganization of microtubules. Our data provide further information regarding the activity of this class Of Compounds upon T. cruzi which should aid future design and synthesis of agents that Could be used for Chagas disease therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据