4.3 Review

Wild rodents as a model to discover genes and pathways underlying natural variation in infectious disease susceptibility

期刊

PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 386-395

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pim.12036

关键词

cytokines; evolution; immunogenetics; infectious disease susceptibility; natural populations; pathogen resistance; wild rodents

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council, UK
  2. NERC [NE/J007307/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J007307/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individuals vary in their susceptibility to infectious disease, and it is now well established that host genetic factors form a major component of this variation. The discovery of genes underlying susceptibility has the potential to lead to improved disease control, through the identification and management of vulnerable individuals and the discovery of novel therapeutic targets. Laboratory rodents have proved invaluable for ascertaining the function of genes involved in immunity to infection. However, these captive animals experience conditions very different to the natural environment, lacking the genetic diversity and environmental pressures characteristic of natural populations, including those of humans. It has therefore often proved difficult to translate basic laboratory research to the real world. In order to further our understanding of the genetic basis of infectious disease resistance, and the evolutionary forces that drive variation in susceptibility, we propose that genetic research traditionally conducted on laboratory animals is expanded to the more ecologically valid arena of natural populations. In this article, we highlight the potential of using wild rodents as a new resource for biomedical research, to link the functional genetic knowledge gained from laboratory rodents with the variation in infectious disease susceptibility observed in humans and other natural populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据