4.4 Article

A Novel Model of Severe Gallstone Pancreatitis: Murine Pancreatic Duct Ligation Results in Systemic Inflammation and Substantial Mortality

期刊

PANCREATOLOGY
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 536-544

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000320776

关键词

Mouse; Acinar cell; Nuclear factor kappa B; Cytokines; Acute pancreatitis; Acute lung injury; Systemic inflammatory response syndrome; Multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development (Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development), Washington
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md., USA [R01 DK071731]
  3. NIH [R01 DK-071731]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK071731] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Suitable experimental models of gallstone pancreatitis with systemic inflammation and mortality are limited. We developed a novel murine model of duct-ligation-induced acute pancreatitis associated with multiorgan dysfunction and severe mortality. Methods: Laparotomy was done on C57/BL6 mice followed by pancreatic duct (PD) ligation, bile duct (BD) ligation without PD ligation, or sham operation. Results: Only mice with PD ligation developed acute pancreatitis and had 100% mortality. Pulmonary compliance was significantly reduced after PD ligation but not BD ligation. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid neutrophil count and interleukin-1 beta concentration, and the plasma creatinine level, were significantly elevated with PD ligation but not BD ligation. Pancreatic nuclear factor kappa B (p65) and activator protein 1 (c-Jun) were activated within 1 h of PD ligation. Conclusion: PD-ligation-induced acute pancreatitis in mice is associated with systemic inflammation, acute lung injury, multiorgan dysfunction and death. The development of this novel model is an exciting and notable advance in the field. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel and IAP

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据