4.3 Article

Proteinase-Activated Receptors Differentially Modulate In Vitro Invasion of Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma PANC-1 Cells in Correlation With Changes in the Expression of CDC42 Protein

期刊

PANCREAS
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 103-108

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31829f0b81

关键词

pancreatic adenocarcinoma; PANC-1 cell line; proteinase-activated receptors; invasion; migration; CDC42

资金

  1. Andy Lebach Chair of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Tel Aviv University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) and PAR-2 have been associated with increased invasiveness and metastasis in human malignancies. The role of PAR-3 has been less investigated. We examined the role of PARs in a human pancreatic adenocarcinoma PANC-1 cell line phenotype in vitro. Methods We knocked down PAR-1, PAR-2, or PAR-3, whereas empty vector-infected cells served as controls. Specific peptide agonists of PARs were used to stimulate the receptors. In vitro assays of colony formation, migration, and invasion were used to characterize the phenotypes, and Western analysis was used to follow cell division control protein 42 homolog (CDC42) expression. Results PAR-1 and PAR-2 knockdowns (KDs) were markedly less, whereas PAR-3 KDs were robustly more migratory and invasive than the controls. Stimulation of PAR-1 or PAR-2 by their peptide agonists increased, whereas PAR-3 agonist reduced the invasion of the control cells. Knockdowns of all three PARs exhibited changes in the expression of CDC42, which correlated with the changes in their invasion. Conversely, stimulation of vector-control cells with PAR-1 or PAR-2 agonists enhanced, whereas PAR-3 agonist reduced the expression of CDC42. In the respective KD cells, the effects of the agonists were abrogated. Conclusion The expression and/or activation of PARs is linked to the invasiveness of PANC-1 cells in vitro, probably via modulation of the expression of CDC42.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据