4.3 Article

Effect and Cost of Treatment for Acute Pancreatitis With or Without Gabexate Mesylate A Propensity Score Analysis Using a Nationwide Administrative Database

期刊

PANCREAS
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 260-264

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31826495a0

关键词

acute pancreatitis; protease inhibitor; gabexate mesylate; propensity score analysis

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan [H22-Policy-031]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science [22390131]
  3. Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST program) from the Council for Science and Technology Policy, Japan [0301002001001]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22390131] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Despite a lack of evidence, gabexate mesylate (GM) is routinely used for the treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP) in some countries. The present study examined the effect and cost of GM for AP treatment using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Methods: We performed a propensity score analysis to compare inhospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total costs between patients with AP treated with GM and those without GM in 2010. Results: We identified 2483 patients treated with GM and 890 patients without GM. Overall, 77% of the patients treated with GM were nonsevere AP cases. The propensity-matched 707 pairs showed no significant difference between GM users and nonusers in inhospital mortality or median length of stay in nonsevere AP (1.0% vs 1.2%, P = 0.789; 10 vs 10 days, P = 0.160) and severe AP (8.4% vs 5.0%, P = 0.438; 12 vs 14 days, P = 0.487) cases. Total costs were significantly different between the GM users and the nonusers in nonsevere AP cases (US$4982 vs US$4373, P < 0.001), but not in severe AP cases ($6605 vs $6490, P = 0.764). Conclusions: Using GM for nonsevere AP cannot be justified because of higher costs without significant effects. Gabexate mesylate use is also not justifiable for severe AP because it does not reduce mortality or length of stay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据