4.3 Article

Impact of Histological Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Recurrence-Free Survival in UICC-T3 Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma But Not in UICC-T4

期刊

PANCREAS
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 130-136

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182236442

关键词

locally advanced pancreatic cancer; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; histological response; Evans's histopathological criteria; gemcitabine; survival analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Although the prognostic benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) against pancreatic cancer has been indicated by several reports, it is controversial whether histological response is associated with prognosis. The objective was to explore the relationship between histological response and prognosis in T3 and T4 pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: We histologically examined the resected specimens obtained from 58 patients (T3, n = 40; and T4, n = 18) for whom we performed curative-intent resection after NCRT. Histological response was evaluated according to Evans's criteria to determine whether it influenced survival. Results: In T3 tumors, 13 (32.5%) belonged to high responders (tumor destruction of >50%) (R0, n = 13) and 27 (67.5%) belonged to low responders (tumor destruction of <= 50%) (R0, n = 22, R1, n = 3, R2, n = 2). Recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in high responders than in low responders (3-year recurrence-free survival rates: 71.3% vs 13.1%, P = 0.0095). In T4 tumors, however, only 1 (5.6%) was a high responder, and R0 resection was obtained only in 5 patients (27.8%). Conclusions: In T3 tumors, histological response is considered a significant prognostic indicator, securing the surgical margin, whereas in T4 tumors, NCRT did not provide beneficial histological response, not securing the surgical margin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据