4.3 Article

Quantification of Insulin Gene Expression During Development of Pancreatic Islet Cells

期刊

PANCREAS
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 201-208

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181bab68f

关键词

insulin gene quantification; islet development; bioinformatics algorithms; microarray; real-time RT-PCR

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Diabetes Research Foundation of Western Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Despite great progress in understanding the transcriptional regulation of the development of insulin-secreting A cells, the quantitative temporal expression of insulin gene(s) remains largely unknown. We here aimed to quantify insulin gene transcripts during development. Methods: We described bioinformatics algorithms to quantify (insulin) gene transcript abundance in sequential microarray data sets at the global level. Several molecular techniques were used to confirm our analyses. Results: We demonstrated that the expression of insulin genes was up-regulated at approximately 14-fold, 700- to 2000-fold, and 5000- to 6000-fold in Pdx1- and Ngn3-expressing cells and adult islets compared with definitive endodermal or embryonic stem cells, respectively. The expression of multiple genes encoding molecules involved in posttranslational modi. cations of insulin and glucose sensing was also elevated in the same period. All islet and associated genes determined with microarray data were confirmed not only to be up-regulated by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction but also that the magnitude of their increase quantified with these 2 methods was statistically highly correlated. Consistent with the above, green fluorescence protein expression under the control of the mouse insulin 1 promoter could be visualized in the pancreas from embryonic day (E) 11.5, increasing progressively through E13.5 to E15.5. Conclusion: Our study provides a novel insight into islet developmental biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据