4.0 Article

Taxonomic evaluation of various morphological characters in the Late Cretaceous desmoceratine polyphyletic genus Damesites from the Yezo Group in Hokkaido and Sakhalin

期刊

PALEONTOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 33-55

出版社

PALAEONTOLOGICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.2517/1342-8144-14.1.033

关键词

Cretaceous; Damesites; desmoceratine ammonoid; ontogenetic changes in shell; taxonomy; Tragodesmoceroides

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports [21540483]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21540483] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intra- and interspecific variation and ontogenetic changes in various shell characters of the Late Cretaceous desmoceratine ammonoid Damesites are described, and their taxonomic implications are discussed based on specimens from the Cretaceous Yezo Group in Hokkaido and Sakhalin. Our study reveals that many diagnostic features (e. g., appearance of longitudinal striations, height of ribbing, regularity of ribbing as well as constriction curvature) and early internal shell structures, are in fact inappropriate as diagnostic features of Damesaes morphotypes. In contrast, ontogenetic changes in shell ornament, curvature of growth lines and whorl expansion ratio are herein demonstrated to be key characters for species recognition and reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships of the taxa of the subfamily Desmoceratinae. Based on these results, previously described Damesites species from the uppermost Turonian-lower Campanian interval should be reclassified into three groups. Damesites damesi, D. damesi intermedius, D. semicostatus, and D. laticarinatus are assigned to the first group. D. ainuanus and Damesites sp. are assigned to the second group. D. stigma from the Vezo Group represents the third group. Furthermore, analysis of ontogenetic changes in shell ornament, curvature of growth lines, and whorl expansion ratio suggests that the second and third groups together belong to a different evolutionary lineage from the first group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据