3.9 Article

Widespread and synchronous change in deep-ocean circulation in the North and South Atlantic during the Late Cretaceous

期刊

PALEOCEANOGRAPHY
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011PA002240

关键词

-

资金

  1. NERC (UK) [NE/E001114/1]
  2. Royal Society University
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E001114/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NE/E001114/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modern thermohaline circulation plays a role in latitudinal heat transport and in deep-ocean ventilation, yet ocean circulation may have functioned differently during past periods of extreme warmth, such as the Cretaceous. The Late Cretaceous (100-65 Ma) was an important period in the evolution of the North Atlantic Ocean, characterized by opening ocean gateways, long-term climatic cooling and the cessation of intermittent periods of anoxia (oceanic anoxic events, OAEs). However, how these phenomena relate to deep-water circulation is unclear. We use a proxy for deep-water mass composition (neodymium isotopes; epsilon(Nd)) to show that, at North Atlantic ODP Site 1276, deep waters shifted in the early Campanian (similar to 78-83 Ma) from epsilon(Nd) values of similar to-7 to values of similar to-9, consistent with a change in the style of deep-ocean circulation but >10 Myr after a change in bottom water oxygenation conditions. A similar, but more poorly dated, trend exists in epsilon(Nd) data from DSDP Site 386. The Campanian epsilon(Nd) transition observed in the North Atlantic records is also seen in the South Atlantic and proto-Indian Ocean, implying a widespread and synchronous change in deep-ocean circulation. Although a unique explanation does not exist for the change at present, we favor an interpretation that invokes Late Cretaceous climatic cooling as a driver for the formation of Southern Component Water, which flowed northward from the Southern Ocean and into the North Atlantic and proto-Indian Oceans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据