3.9 Article

Abrupt changes of intermediate water properties on the northeastern slope of the Bering Sea during the last glacial and deglacial period

期刊

PALEOCEANOGRAPHY
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011PA002205

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for Promotion of Science [18101001]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan
  3. University of Tokyo
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18101001, 22310014] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Millennial-scale variability in the behavior of North Pacific Intermediate Water during the last glacial and deglacial period, and its association with Dansgaard-Oeschger (D-O) cycles and Heinrich events, are examined based on benthic foraminiferal oxygen and carbon isotopes (delta O-18(bf) and delta C-13(bf)) and %CaCO3 using a sediment core recovered from the northeastern slope of the Bering Sea. A suite of positive delta O-18(bf) excursions at intermediate depths of the Bering Sea, which seem at least in part associated with increases in the delta O-18(bf) gradients between the Bering and Okhotsk Seas, suggest the Bering Sea as a proximate source of intermediate water during several severe stadial episodes in the last glacial and deglacial period. Absence of such delta O-18(bf) gradients during periods of high surface productivity in the Bering and Okhotsk Seas, which we correlate to D-O interstadials, suggests a reduction in intermediate water production in the Bering Sea and subsequent introduction of nutrient-rich deep waters from the North Pacific into intermediate depths of the Bering Sea. We argue that a reorganization of atmospheric circulation in the high-latitude North Pacific during severe cold episodes in the last glacial and deglacial period created favorable conditions for brine rejection in the northeastern Bering Sea. The resulting salinity increase in the cold surface waters could have initiated intermediate (and deep) water formation that spread out to the North Pacific.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据