4.4 Review

Ketamine for Pain in Adults and Children with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of the Literature

期刊

PAIN MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 1505-1517

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/pme.12182

关键词

Ketamine; Cancer Pain; Children; Pediatric; Chronic Pain; Adverse Events

资金

  1. US Food and Drug Administration
  2. US National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveChronic cancer pain is often refractory and difficult to treat. Ketamine is a medication with evidence of efficacy in the treatment of chronic pain. DesignThis article presents a synthesis of the data on ketamine for refractory cancer pain in adults and children. ResultsThere are five randomized, double-blind, controlled trials of ketamine use in cancer pain that demonstrate improvement in pain for some patients. There are six prospective, uncontrolled trials in cancer pain that also demonstrate improvement in pain scores for some patients. There are no randomized, controlled trials in children with cancer pain, although there are a few studies reflecting improved pain control with ketamine for children with cancer pain. Adverse events for adults on ketamine are most commonly somnolence, feelings of insobriety, nausea/vomiting, hallucinations, depersonalization/derealization, and drowsiness. However, when ketamine is combined with benzodiazepines, feelings of insobriety, hallucinations, and depersonalization/derealization are not reported. Children on ketamine have had few reported adverse effects, which include sedation, anorexia, urinary retention, and myoclonic movements. Recommended ketamine infusion dosages are from 0.05 to 0.5mg/kg/h (intravenous or subcutaneous). Recommended oral dosages of ketamine are 0.2-0.5mg/kg/dose two to three times daily with a maximum of 50mg/dose three times daily. ConclusionsDespite limitations in the breadth and depth of data available, there is evidence that ketamine may be a viable option for treatment-refractory cancer pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据