4.4 Article

Postoperative Pain Assessment after Pediatric Otolaryngologic Surgery

期刊

PAIN MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 1786-1796

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/pme.12209

关键词

Postoperative Pain; Otolaryngology; Surgery; Quality Management; QUIPSI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesTo describe postoperative pain within the first 24 hours after pediatric otolaryngologic surgery and to identify factors influencing postoperative pain. MethodsOne-hundred and thirty four children were included in a prospective cohort single center study. Outcome and process parameters were analyzed using the questionnaires of the German-wide project Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management in Infants (QUIPSI). ResultsMaximal pain within the first 24 hours after typical otolaryngologic surgery reached average numeric rating scale values of 4.003.49. About one fifth demanded more pain medications. Inpatient surgery, longer surgery, and major surgery were associated with more maximal pain. Analysis of analgesic use on the ward indicated insufficient utilization of these drugs, especially when piritramide was used (beta=3.597, P=0.039). When ibuprofen was used on the ward, this was significantly associated with the desire for more pain medication (odds ratio [OR]: 0.274, confidence interval [CI]: 0.103-0.725, P=0.009). Children with American Society of Anesthesiologists status 2 were more fatigued after surgery than status 1 children (OR: 0.296, CI: 0.100-0.874, P=0.028). Nausea was more common when ibuprofen was used on the ward for pain treatment (OR: 0.195, CI: 0.049-0.777, P=0.020). ConclusionsQUIPSI is an easy tool to evaluate the quality of postoperative pain management following pediatric otolaryngologic surgery in children older than 3 years, especially in children older than 9 years. The maximal pain values within the first 24 hours are significant, so that pain therapy is required. It seems that both nonopioids and opioids are underdosed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据