4.4 Article

The Safety and Efficacy of KAI-1678 An Inhibitor of Epsilon Protein Kinase C (εPKC)Versus Lidocaine and Placebo for the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Crossover Study Design

期刊

PAIN MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 533-540

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/pme.12058

关键词

KAI-1678; Epsilon Protein Kinase C Inhibitor; Analgesic; Postherpetic Neuralgia

资金

  1. KAI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) occurs in approximately 1020% of patients with herpes zoster, and the risk increases with age. In this clinical trial, we evaluated the analgesic properties of KAI-1678an inhibitor of epsilon protein kinase Cin the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with PHN. Design. The study was a three-treatment period, double-blind, randomized, placebo and active comparator crossover trial evaluating subcutaneous infusions of KAI-1678 (25mg), placebo, and lidocaine hydrochloride (700mg; active comparator). Patients. A total of 17 men and 6 women (N=23) were enrolled after fulfilling diagnosis of PHN with pain persisting for 3 months after a segmental herpes zoster eruption. Patients had to have a mean average pain score of 4 points on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; ranging from 0 to 10) based on at least three daily entries prior to participation in the subsequent treatment period. Results. Overall, administration of KAI-1678 was generally safe and well tolerated. However, compared with placebo, KAI-1678 did not improve clinical pain scores as recorded using the NRS (010). In contrast, subcutaneous infusions of lidocaine were associated with a significant reduction in pain intensity at the end of the infusion. Conclusions. We conclude that KAI-1678 is not efficacious as an acute analgesic for chronic neuropathic pain because of PHN. However, for the first time, the results demonstrate that subcutaneous infusions of lidocaine are effective in treating neuropathic pain. The results of lidocaine treatment also indicate that the crossover study design was adequate to detect a clinically meaningful response in this analgesia study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据