4.4 Article

Age and Sex Trends in Long-term Opioid Use in Two Large American Health Systems Between 2000 and 2005

期刊

PAIN MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 248-256

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00740.x

关键词

Opioids; Prescriptions; Chronic Pain; Disparities-Gender; Aged; Mood; Anxiety

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA022560]
  2. American Geriatrics Society Foundation for Health in Aging Hartford Geriatric Health Outcomes Research Fellowship
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA022560] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To estimate recent age- and sex-specific changes in long-term opioid prescription among patients with chronic pain in two large American Health Systems. Design. Analysis of administrative pharmacy data to calculate changes in prevalence of long-term opioid prescription (90 days or more during a calendar year) from 2000 to 2005, within groups based on sex and age (18-44, 45-64, and 65 years and older). Separate analyses were conducted for patients with and without a diagnosis of a mood disorder or anxiety disorder. Changes in mean dose between 2000 and 2005 were estimated, as were changes in the rate of prescription for different opioid types (short-acting, long-acting, and non-Schedule 2). Patients. Enrollees in HealthCore (N = 2,716,163 in 2000) and Arkansas Medicaid (N = 115,914 in 2000). Results. Within each of the age and sex groups, less than 10% of patients with a chronic pain diagnosis in HealthCore, and less than 33% in Arkansas Medicaid, received long-term opioid prescriptions. All age, sex, and anxiety/depression groups showed similar and statistically significant increases in long-term opioid prescription between 2000 and 2005 (35-50% increase). Per-patient daily doses did not increase. Conclusions. No one group showed especially large increases in long-term opioid prescriptions between 2000 and 2005. These results argue against a recent epidemic of opioid prescribing. These trends may result from increased attention to pain in clinical settings, policy or economic changes, or provider and patient openness to opioid therapy. The risks and benefits to patients of these changes are not yet established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据